This paper investigates how financing practices and constraints of Small and Medium Construction Firms (SMCFs) affect their participation in and contribution to affordable housing delivery in selected urban centers in Ghana. Drawing on empirical evidence from peer-reviewed literature, the study identifies critical financing barriers that impede SMCFs’ ability to undertake housing projects. Key findings reveal that access to finance, limited collateral, high interest rates, and inadequate working capital management practices constitute major obstacles to SMCFs’ housing delivery activities. The study emphasizes that financing constraints significantly reduce investment efficiency and project completion rates, thereby undermining the capacity of SMCFs to contribute meaningfully to addressing Ghana’s acute housing deficit. The paper concludes that targeted policy interventions, innovative financing mechanisms, and strengthened institutional support are essential to unlock SMCFs’ potential in affordable housing delivery. Recommendations include establishing dedicated housing finance schemes for SMCFs, improving access to credit through guarantee programs, and promoting public-private partnerships that leverage government resources with private sector expertise.
Keywords: financing constraints, small and medium construction firms, affordable housing, urban Ghana, housing delivery, financing barriers
- Introduction
The global housing crisis has intensified over the past two decades, with developing countries in sub-Saharan Africa facing particularly acute challenges. Ghana, as one of West Africa’s leading economies, confronts a severe housing shortage that threatens socio-economic development and urban sustainability. Current estimates indicate that Ghana faces a housing deficit of approximately 1.8 million units, with annual growth of approximately 70,000 units (Sarpong et al., 2025). This deficit is compounded by rapid urbanization, rural-to-urban migration, and the concentration of urban population growth in major metropolitan areas including Accra, Kumasi, and Sekondi-Takoradi. The construction industry, particularly Small and Medium Construction Firms (SMCFs), serves as a critical engine for housing delivery in Ghana. SMCFs contribute significantly to employment creation, economic growth, and housing supply at all income levels. However, despite their importance, these firms continue to operate under severe financing constraints that limit their capacity to undertake affordable housing projects systematically. Understanding these financing constraints and their implications for housing delivery is essential for policymakers, development practitioners, and researchers seeking to address Ghana’s persistent housing crisis.
While Ghana’s housing deficit is well-documented, less attention has been paid to the specific role of financing constraints in limiting SMCFs’ participation in affordable housing delivery. Traditional large-scale housing developers, typically operating in the formal sector with access to institutional finance, focus primarily on middle- and high-income housing markets. Consequently, SMCFs—which are better positioned to serve lower-income populations and operate in decentralized urban locations—remain underfunded and underutilized as instruments for affordable housing delivery. This paper investigates how financing practices and constraints of SMCFs affect their participation in and contribution to affordable housing delivery in selected urban centres in Ghana.
- The Housing Crisis in Ghana and West Africa
Housing constitutes a fundamental human necessity and represents a critical indicator of national development. In Ghana, the housing situation reflects broader development challenges affecting urban centers across West Africa. Research examining the housing finance markets in Nigeria and Ghana reveals that both countries maintain underdeveloped housing finance systems characterized by insufficient institutional capacity, limited financial products, and restricted access for lower-income populations (Ofor et al., 2019). The construction of housing units is inherently capital-intensive, representing the highest investment undertaken by most households. Consequently, only a limited proportion of Ghana’s population can construct homes using personal income, necessitating external financing mechanisms that remain inadequate in both supply and accessibility.
The housing deficit in Ghana is driven by a complex interplay of demographic, financial, land, planning, and policy factors (Wuni et al., 2018). Rapid urbanization and rural-to-urban migration have concentrated housing demand in major urban centers, yet housing supply has failed to keep pace. This supply-demand imbalance has resulted in the proliferation of informal settlements, characterized by poor housing quality, inadequate services, and tenure insecurity. Previous research indicates that mass social housing initiatives and national housing policies have proven resistant to policy interventions, suggesting that alternative approaches incorporating individual and community-level housing delivery warrant greater attention.
2.1 Financing Constraints Facing Small and Medium Enterprises in Construction
Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) globally face significant financing constraints that impede business growth and operational efficiency. In developing countries, sectoral differences emerge as the strongest predictors of financing obstacle severity (Nthangu & Msweli, 2025). Sectors with high capital and logistics requirements, including construction—experience heightened financial challenges compared to service-oriented sectors. Within the construction sector specifically, smaller firms report more severe financing constraints than their larger counterparts, reflecting limited asset bases, weak collateral positions, and reduced capacity to navigate complex lending requirements. Research examining commercial banks’ loan eligibility criteria for small construction businesses identified critical determinants including client relationship, character, collateral, capital, capacity, and affordability (Eyiah and Bondinuba, 2020). The research revealed that small construction enterprises face difficulties in meeting collateral requirements and demonstrating sufficient cash flow to service debt obligations. Relationship-based lending, which relies on years of banking relationships and provides flexibility in loan terms, remains concentrated among firms with established connections to financial institutions—a resource unavailable to many nascent or growing SMCFs.
2.2 Investment Efficiency and Financing Constraints
The relationship between financing constraints and investment efficiency among construction firms has received limited but important scholarly attention. Research examining real estate and construction firms documented that a significant proportion of firms experienced investment rate losses attributable to financing constraints during studied periods. The investment efficiency index for these firms demonstrated variable patterns, suggesting that smaller firms maintain conservative investment postures during periods of constrained financing. These findings suggest that financing constraints operate not only to reduce the absolute volume of investment but also to distort firms’ capital allocation decisions, reduce project diversification, and limit firms’ ability to pursue growth opportunities (Bondinuba. and Stephens, 2018). For SMCFs in Ghana seeking to participate in affordable housing delivery, such constraints translate into reduced project portfolios, extended project timelines, and diminished capacity to undertake multiple simultaneous projects.
2.3 Access to Finance and Credit Eligibility for Construction SMEs
Commercial banks employ standardized credit assessment models to evaluate small enterprise financing applications. These models typically incorporate multiple dimensions including business history, owner background and character, collateral availability, capital adequacy, business capacity, and affordability metrics. Each dimension presents distinct challenges for SMCFs in developing country contexts.
Collateral Requirements: Banks generally require substantial collateral securities to mitigate lending risk. For construction SMCFs, collateral typically comprises business assets, land holdings, or personal guarantees. Many SMCFs, particularly those in early growth stages, lack sufficient collateral to satisfy banking requirements. The complexity of land tenure systems in Ghana, characterized by overlapping statutory and customary ownership frameworks, further complicates collateral provision by introducing tenure uncertainty and limiting banks’ confidence in asset recovery through foreclosure (Eyiah, et al., 2025)
Character and Business History: Credit history and owner business background significantly influence lending decisions. SMCFs operated by first-generation entrepreneurs or those lacking formal business education face disadvantages in demonstrating creditworthiness through historical performance records. Furthermore, informal accounting practices prevalent among many SMCFs prevent transparent documentation of financial performance, rendering credit assessment more difficult and riskier from lenders’ perspectives.
Capital Adequacy: Banks assess whether firms maintain sufficient equity capital to absorb project-specific risks and demonstrate commitment to projects through personal investment. Many SMCFs operate with minimal equity capital, relying instead on project advances and supplier credit to finance operations. This capital structure renders firms vulnerable to project delays and cost overruns, thereby increasing default risk.
2.4 Barriers to SMCFs Growth and Housing Delivery Participation
Research examining indigenous construction firms in Nigeria identifies three primary domains of barriers to firm growth, ranked in descending order of importance: low patronage, difficulty accessing funds, and business management incapacity. The “difficulty accessing funds” barrier remains consistently cited as a limiting factor to SMCF growth and operational expansion. Firms experiencing declining trajectories demonstrate greater negative impact from inadequate financing compared to stunted or growing firms, suggesting that financing constraints disproportionately affect vulnerable SMCFs. In Ghana specifically, barriers to sustainable building project performance include poor communication, project cost and schedule constraints, and inadequate monitoring and evaluation (Al-Otaibi et al., 2025). Cost and schedule constraints, fundamentally linked to financing limitations, emerge as the second most significant barrier to construction project success. These barriers align with sustainable development concerns, particularly SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), which emphasize resilient infrastructure and sustainable urban development.
2.5 Housing Delivery Models and Financing Mechanisms
2.5.1 Labour-Only Subcontracting
Labour-only subcontracting (LOS) represents a significant model through which housing is delivered in Ghana, particularly for lower-income housing construction (Hedidor, et al., 2016). Research examining housing delivery in Tamale Metropolis identified increased productivity, quality improvement, cooperation, flexibility, and convenience alongside lack of ready cash as major drivers of labour-only subcontracting adoption (Alimisiwon et al., 2023). This model allows individual developers and SMCFs with limited working capital to proceed with housing construction by concentrating capital expenditure on material procurement while engaging skilled laborers on contractual bases. However, this arrangement creates vulnerabilities for workers and fragmented project management structures.
2.5.2 Innovative Financing Mechanisms
Emerging research highlights innovative financing approaches that address SMCF constraints. Sustainability-oriented strategies combined with financing mechanisms have shown promise in enabling SMCEs to pursue both economic and sustainability objectives. By structuring financing optimally, financial constraints can be simultaneously resolved while fostering adherence to sustainability practices, positioning such instruments as dual-purpose enablers of economic growth and environmental responsibility.
2.5.3 Appropriate Technology and Affordable Housing
Appropriate technology and design approaches present opportunities to reduce housing costs and accelerate delivery. Research examining technology adoption in Ghana’s major urban centers found that hydrafoam, adobe bricks, timber homes, and wattle and daub technologies represent acceptable low-cost solutions (Tekpe et al., 2022). However, adoption remains limited, with insufficient emphasis placed on appropriate technology and design in addressing affordable housing challenges. Increased stakeholder emphasis and policy support for appropriate technologies could reduce construction costs, thereby lowering financing requirements for individual housing projects.
- Methodology
This paper employs a systematic narrative review methodology, synthesizing evidence from peer-reviewed literature, policy documents, and empirical research on financing constraints, SMCFs, and housing delivery in Ghana and comparable developing country contexts. The review integrates findings from multiple disciplinary perspectives including construction management, development economics, housing studies, and financial management.
3.1 Search Strategy. Literature sources were identified through comprehensive database searches using combinations of keywords including: “financing constraints,” “small and medium construction firms,” “affordable housing,” “Ghana,” “housing delivery,” “SME financing,” “construction financing barriers,” and “urban housing.” Databases consulted included Scopus, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and institutional repositories. Selection criteria emphasized peer-reviewed journal articles, working papers, and recent dissertations published between 2015 and 2025, with particular attention to studies conducted in Ghana, West Africa, and comparable developing country contexts.
3.2 Analytical Framework. The analysis adopts a systems perspective, examining how financing constraints operate across multiple levels—from individual firm decision-making to sectoral and institutional structures—to constrain SMCFs’ participation in affordable housing delivery. The framework recognizes that financing constraints operate not in isolation but interact with complementary barriers including limited land access, weak project management capacity, inadequate technology adoption, and regulatory complexities.
- Results and Discussion
4.1 Primary Sources of Financing for SMCFs
4.1.1 Formal Financial Institutions
Commercial banks represent the primary formal source of external financing for construction SMEs. However, access to bank credit remains restricted due to stringent eligibility criteria, collateral requirements, and risk assessment practices. Bank lending to SMCFs typically requires collateral securities representing substantial value of loan requirements, personal guarantees from business owners, and demonstrated business track records. These requirements effectively exclude many nascent and small construction enterprises.
4.1.2 Informal and Alternative Financing Sources. In the absence of adequate formal financing, SMCFs rely on informal financing mechanisms including personal and family savings, trade credit from material suppliers, advance payments from clients, and informal lending groups. While these sources provide essential working capital, they typically offer limited scale, impose high implicit or explicit costs, and create vulnerability to project delays. Supplier credit, though interest-free nominally, often incorporates inflated material prices, increasing overall project costs. Client advance payments, while common, frequently prove insufficient to cover material costs and labor expenses, necessitating supplementary financing from personal resources.
4.1.3 Government Support Programs. Government housing finance programs, including mortgage schemes and developer financing initiatives, remain limited in reach and predominantly benefit formal sector developers and higher-income households. Specific financing programs targeted at SMCFs remain underdeveloped, and awareness among SMCFs of available government support mechanisms remains low (Ofor et al., 2019).
4.2 Critical Financing Constraints Affecting SMCFs
4.2.1 Limited Access to Capital. Access to adequate capital represents the most fundamental constraint affecting SMCFs. The limited availability of long-term financing, including long-term loans and venture capital, reflects both institutional supply limitations and firms’ capacity to access available instruments. SMCFs typically operate with minimal working capital, requiring continuous project cash flows to service labor and material costs. Project delays, client payment defaults, or material supply disruptions create acute cash flow crises that threaten firm viability.
4.2.2 Collateral Constraints. Collateral requirements constitute critical financing barriers for SMCFs lacking substantial physical assets or established banking relationships. In Ghana’s context, overlapping customary and statutory land tenure systems create uncertainty regarding property rights, complicating efforts to use land as collateral (Dinye et al., 2025). Personal residential properties, when available as collateral, expose business owners to catastrophic personal risk, deterring collateral provision even when technically feasible.
4.2.3 High Interest Rates and Lending Terms. Where financing is available to SMCFs, interest rates and lending terms often render projects economically unviable. High interest rates reflect lenders’ assessment of SMCF default risk and transaction costs associated with small loan administration. For a typical housing project financed at prevailing interest rates, interest costs substantially increase project costs, reduce affordability for target end-users and project profitability for developers.
4.2.4 Weak Working Capital Management. Many SMCFs demonstrate limited capacity in working capital management practices, complicating their ability to navigate existing financing options effectively. Working capital management encompasses cash flow forecasting, inventory management, accounts receivable management, and supplier payment scheduling. Weak working capital management increases operational risk, making SMCFs less attractive lending prospects and rendering them vulnerable to financial distress.
4.3 Implications for Affordable Housing Delivery
4.3.1 Reduced Investment Efficiency. Financing constraints directly reduce SMCFs’ investment efficiency—their capacity to convert available capital into completed housing projects. Limited capital constrains project scale, limits project diversification, and extends project timelines as firms sequentially undertake smaller projects to manage cash flow limitations. Extended timelines increase project costs through inflation effects and overhead accumulation, reducing final affordability for housing consumers.
4.3.2 Limited Project Participation. Financing constraints restrict the number of SMCFs able to participate in affordable housing delivery simultaneously. Many potential SMCFs remain inactive or operate at minimal capacity due to insufficient initial capital. This constrained participation reduces overall housing supply, preventing market expansion that would occur if financing barriers were reduced.
4.3.3 Quality and Sustainability Compromises. Financing constraints may incentivize cost-reduction through substandard material selection, inadequate labor compensation, and deferred maintenance provisions. These cost-cutting measures, while improving short-term project economics, compromise housing quality and durability. Research examining construction practices in Nigeria documented that low-income developers frequently cut corners to reduce costs, utilizing substandard materials and unskilled labor that compromise building integrity (Emmanuel et al., 2025). Similar practices likely occur among Ghanaian SMCFs operating under severe financing constraints.
4.3.4 Gender Exclusion. The disproportionate impact of financing constraints on female-led construction firms reduces women’s participation in housing delivery, perpetuating gender-based occupational segregation. Enhanced financing access specifically targeting women entrepreneurs would broaden SMCF diversity and align with gender equality objectives embedded in sustainable development frameworks.
- Proposed Solutions and Policy Recommendations
5.1 Government Credit Guarantee Programs. Establishing government-backed credit guarantee schemes specifically for SMCFs undertaking affordable housing projects would substantially improve financing access. Such programs would underwrite a portion of lending risk, reducing banks’ perceived default risk and enabling lower interest rates and improved lending terms. Ghana could establish a National Housing Finance Guarantee Scheme targeting SMCFs undertaking projects for lower-income households.
5.2 Dedicated Housing Finance Instruments. Government should establish specialized housing finance instruments tailored to SMCF operational characteristics, including:
Graduated Collateral Requirements: Accept non-traditional collateral including business assets, equipment, and equipment leases, reducing dependence on real estate collateral.
Extended Repayment Periods: Structure loan repayment over project lifespans or extended periods (15-20 years) rather than conventional 3–5-year terms, aligning repayment schedules with project cash generation.
Contingent Financing: Provide progressively larger loan tranches as projects advance through construction phases, reducing ex-ante capital requirements and linking financing to verifiable project progress.
5.3 Public-Private Partnership Frameworks
Government should establish formalized public-private partnership (PPP) frameworks enabling collaboration between public sector housing initiatives and private SMCFs. PPP models documented in international contexts including the United Kingdom, Singapore, and South Africa demonstrate that government participation in project preparation, risk mitigation, and market creation substantially enhances SMCF participation in affordable housing delivery (Akinsulire et al., 2024).
5.4 Capacity Building and Technical Assistance. Government and development partners should invest in SMCF capacity building covering:
Financial Management Training: Strengthen SMCFs’ working capital management, financial forecasting, and accounting practices, enabling more effective deployment of available financing and improved credit access.
Project Management Training: Enhance project planning, scheduling, and cost estimation capabilities, reducing project delays and cost overruns that exacerbate financing constraints.
Technology Adoption Support: Facilitate SMCF adoption of appropriate technologies and building techniques that reduce construction costs without compromising quality.
5.5 Improved Land Tenure and Property Rights. Strengthening land tenure security through systematic land titling, dispute resolution mechanisms, and legal reforms addressing customary-statutory tenure overlaps would enhance collateral availability and reduce collateral-related financing barriers. Research examining urban development in Accra documented that tenure insecurity significantly constrains formal housing finance access (Andreasen et al., 2022).
5.6 Targeted Support for Female-Led Firms. Government should establish dedicated financing programs and technical support initiatives targeting female-led construction firms, including women-focused credit schemes, management training, and anti-discrimination enforcement in banking relationships. Such initiatives would broaden SMCF participation and advance gender equality objectives.
5.7 Digital Financial Inclusion. Expansion of digital financial services and mobile money platforms would reduce transaction costs associated with SMCF lending, enabling banks to profitably serve smaller loan amounts and reduce financing barriers. Digital platforms would also improve financial transparency and credit history documentation, reducing information asymmetries that currently disadvantage SMCFs.
- Conclusions
Financing constraints represent the most fundamental barrier limiting SMCFs’ participation in affordable housing delivery in urban Ghana. These constraints operate across multiple dimensions—limited access to capital, collateral requirements, high interest rates, and weak firm-level financial management capacity—to restrict SMCFs’ investment efficiency, project participation, and housing delivery capacity. The evidence synthesized in this paper demonstrates that existing formal financing mechanisms inadequately serve SMCFs’ housing development needs. While SMCFs possess comparative advantages including local operational presence, flexibility, and capacity to serve lower-income housing markets, these advantages remain insufficient to overcome systemic financing barriers. The gap between potential SMCF capacity and realized participation in housing delivery reflects financing constraints rather than technical incapacity or market demand insufficiency.
Addressing Ghana’s acute housing deficit requires deliberate government policy action to reduce financing barriers constraining SMCFs. Such action should incorporate multiple complementary instruments including credit guarantee schemes, tailored financing products, PPP frameworks, capacity building initiatives, land tenure reform, targeted support for underrepresented groups, and digital financial inclusion. Isolated interventions addressing single barriers prove insufficient; rather, comprehensive approaches incorporating multiple simultaneously deployed instruments offer greater promises for substantively expanding SMCF participation in affordable housing delivery. The financial sustainability of such interventions depends on demonstrating that SMCF-delivered housing generates social and economic benefits exceeding government investment costs. Evidence from international contexts, including South Africa’s social housing initiatives and Singapore’s public housing model, indicates that government investment in SMCF financing access generates positive returns through employment creation, local economic development, and housing security improvements (Akinsulire et al., 2024).
Future research should investigate: (1) optimal design parameters for government guarantee schemes and specialized housing finance instruments; (2) SMCF-specific financial management practices and their evolution under improved financing access; (3) mechanisms for ensuring housing quality and sustainability in SMCF-delivered projects; and (4) comparative effectiveness of diverse policy instruments in expanding SMCF housing delivery participation across different Ghanaian urban contexts. In conclusion, Ghana’s transition toward adequate affordable housing supply requires deliberate unlocking of SMCFs’ latent capacity through comprehensive financing reform. Policy action to reduce financing barriers represents an essential and potentially transformative intervention for addressing the nation’s housing deficit while simultaneously advancing employment creation, local economic development, and gender equality objectives embedded in sustainable development frameworks.
References
Akinsulire, A. A., Idemudia, C., Okwandu, A. C., & Iwuanyanwu, O. (2024). Public-private partnership frameworks for financing affordable housing: Lessons and models. International Journal of Management Education and Research, 6(7), 1326. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i7.1326
Alimisiwon, A. E., Kheni, N., Issah, A., & Mahama, K. (2023). Significant drivers of labour-only subcontracting in housing delivery in Ghana. International Journal of Current Advanced Research, 42(39), 4252. https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2023/v42i394252
Al-Otaibi, A., Bowan, P., Alabdullatief, A., Albaiz, M., & Salah, M. (2025). Barriers to sustainable building project performance in developing countries: A case of Ghana and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 17(8), 3539. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083539
Andreasen, M. H., Agergaard, J., Kofie, R., Møller-Jensen, L., & OtengAbabio, M. (2022). Urban encroachment in ecologically sensitive areas: drivers, impediments and consequences. Buildings and Cities, 3(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.210
Boafo, H. K., Wuni, I., Yeboah, M. O., & Dinye, R. (2018). Probing the drivers of housing deficit in Ghana: A fresh scoping review. Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning, 1(3), 260. https://doi.org/10.32598/jsrd.01.03.260
Bondinuba, F.K. and Stephens, M., 2018. The influence of urbanisation and housing policies on low-income housing delivery in developing countries. Inclusive city growth and the poor: Policies, challenges and prospects, 16.
Dinye, I., Dinye, R., Ayimaa, R., & Akponzele, R. (2025). Market dynamics and institutional challenges in urban rental housing: An evidence from Kumasi, Ghana. American International Research Journal on New Product Discoveries and Development, 26(5), 1486. https://doi.org/10.9734/air/2025/v26i51486
Emmanuel, A. G., Temitope, A. K., & Julius, O. O. (2025). Haphazard construction practices and delivery of private housing projects in part of southwest, Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 25(13), 813. https://doi.org/10.32628/ijsrset2513813
Eyiah, A.K. and Bondinuba, F.K., 2020. Financing practices and preference of small and medium construction firms in Ghana. International Journal of SMEs and Business Sustainability, 5(01), pp.36-60.
Eyiah, A.K., Bondinuba, F.K., Adu-Gyamfi, L. and Liphadzi, M., 2025. Promoting Effective Management of Cultural Diversity in Multinational Construction Project Teams. Buildings, 15(5), p.659.
Hedidor, D., Bondinuba, F.K. and Sadique, M.A., 2016. Spatial planning in Ghana: Antecedents and the role of local artisans. Journal of Building Construction and Planning Research, 4(3), pp.201-218.
Nthangu, A., & Msweli, P. (2025). Determinants of the primary impediments to SME performance in the South African business environment. International Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 7(5), 940. https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v7i5.940
Ofor, T. N., Alagba, O. S., & Ifurueze, M. S. (2019). Housing finance market and economic growth of West Africa region: A study of Nigeria and Ghana. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, 6(3), 05. https://doi.org/10.24052/IJBED/V06IS03/C-05
Sarpong, C. K., Donbeinaa, A., Awudu, R., Abambire, W., & Yeboah, M. O. (2025). Innovative strategies for affordable housing in Ghanaian cities: A systematic review. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(8), 2252. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i82252
Tekpe, E., Ansah, S. K., & Akomah, B. (2022). Appropriate technology and design: A solution for sustainable and affordable housing delivery in major cities of Ghana. Journal of Environmental Research and Reviews, 23(8), 739. https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2022/v23i8739.